Total Pageviews

After Just Two Episodes, NBC Cancels \'Do No Harm\'

After drawing two of the smallest viewing audiences in network history, the new NBC drama “Do No Harm” will not get a third try. NBC announced late Friday that it is cancelling the show, which was a retelling of the Dr. Jeykll and Mr. Hyde tale.

The premiere a week ago attracted the fewest viewers of any new network drama in a regular season â€" just 3.1 million. Thursday night, the show managed to eclipse even that record by dropping almost a million more people, finishing with a total of just 2.2 million.

NBC had seen enough. It will insert repeats of “Law & Order SVU” on Thursdays at 10 p.m. for at least the next two weeks.



Christina Applegate Leaves \'Up All Night\'

Like the character in Monty Python who keeps getting limbs hacked off but claims to be moving on unaffected, NBC appears to be moving ahead with its revamped edition of the comedy “Up All Night” despite losing not only the original creator of the series, Emily Spivey, and its most recent show-running producer, Tucker Cawley, but as of Friday, also its star, Christina Applegate.

Ms. Applegate announced Friday she has decided to quit the series rather than continue in the new format, which will transform the comedy from a single camera filmed show, to one filmed on tape in front of a studio audience. The news was first reported on the Web site, Deadline Hollywood.

Ms. Applegate’s departure in mid-season as one half of the couple in the middle of a romantic comedy would seem to doom the series. But with the extensive plan already in place to remake the show, NBC may still forge ahead, perhaps recasting the role. As of late Friday, the network was still keeping that option open.

Soap oeras often recast roles and keep going, and new actors often step into existing parts on Broadway. But television shows usually write characters out of shows rather than have new actors play existing characters.

It is not unheard of, however. Perhaps most famously, after Dick York played Darrin Stephens, wife of Elizabeth Montgomery’s Samantha on “Bewitched” for five seasons in the 1960’s, he became unable to continue because of a back condition and was replaced by Dick Sargent for the show’s final three seasons.

Ms. Applegate alluded to the show’s change in creative direction as her reason for leaving. In a statement released Friday, she said: “It’s been a great experience working on ‘Up All Night,’ but the show has taken a different creative direction and I decided it was best for me to move on to other endeavors.”



AARP Will Embrace Life\'s \'Possibilities\' During Grammys

AARP will seek to cultivate a more contemporary image with a big new brand campaign that, to underline the message the advertising intends to convey, will make its debut during the CBS broadcast of the Grammy Awards on Sunday night.

The campaign, with a budget estimated at $25 million to $30 million, will introduce the theme “Real possibilities,” which will appear not only in the ads but also in high-profile locations like the home page of the AARP Web site, aarp.org, and the front cover of publications that include AARP the Magazine.

The campaign is the first work for AARP from the organization’s new brand advertising agency, Grey New York, which was selected to handle the assignment after a lengthy review.  The previous agency for AARP’s brand work was GSD&M in Austin, Tex., part of the Omnicom Group.

ARP is among many blue-chip brands that will advertise during the Grammys show. Although it is nowhere near the showcase for new commercials that the Super Bowl is each year, the Grammys broadcast will feature several new campaigns, like AARP’s, along with new and fresh commercials in ongoing campaigns, like for candy brands sold by Mars.

The Grammys represents “a great venue to reintroduce” AARP and “close the relevance gap,” said Emilio Pardo, chief brand officer at AARP in Washington, by promoting the organization as understanding how the target audience - Americans ages 50 and older - lives their lives today.

“As you get older, you used to have the feeling you had fewer possibilities, for romance, for work,” Mr. Pardo said. “Now, it’s quite the opposite; possibilities should be ageless.”

AARP has addressed those issues previously, particularly when it began using the name AARP in place of what the letters once stood for, American Association of Retired Person! s.

Still, there remain stigmas surrounding the words “retired” and “retirement,” particularly a perception that AARP and its members consider retirement a conclusion rather than the start of something new in life.

To counter that, the “Real possibilities” theme will be used to suggest that AARP members are eagerly “asking what’s next,” Mr. Pardo said.

The ads will underline that by presenting the name AARP as standing for “An Ally for Real Possibilities,” and suggest that the “R” in the name stands for positive words like “Reimagine,” “Rewarding” and “Richer.”

AARP is to run two commercials from the new campaign during the Grammys; there are three more planned. The commercials, filmed in arty black and white by the director Tony Kaye, will be narrated by the actor Chris Noth of “Law & Order” and “Sex and the City,” who is, at age 58, squarely in the organization’s demographic target.

In one commercial, depicting a man driving, Mr.Noth says: “A car has a rather small rear-view mirror so we can occasionally glance back at where we’ve been. It has an enormous windshield, so we can look ahead to where we’re going.”

“Now is always the time to go forward and imagine all the possibilities that lie before us,” Mr. Noth continues, then suggests a visit to aarp.org/possibilities to “find tools and guidance.”

In the other commercial, boots are shown walking down a porch and into a field. “Were you more interesting in your 20s, or now” Mr. Noth asks.

“Experience makes you wiser for the wear,” he adds, “and now come the richer possibilities.”

Rob Baiocco, the executive creative director at Grey New York who wrote the campaign, said he has some perspective on the subject matter because he is, at 49, “close to the AARP age myself.”

“We’re hitting a reset button with this campaign,” Mr. Baiocco said, because the definition of “what it means to be” 50 and older has change! d to the ! point where many people now believe that “instead of running from it, they embrace it.”

“Fifty is not the new 30,” he added. “Fifty is the new 50. Lean into the knowledge and life experience that comes with it.”

The campaign will include, in addition to the television commercials, print and digital ads, radio commercials and a significant presence in social media like Facebook and Twitter.

“Our digital and social outreach might be the most ever in the history of our organization,” Mr. Pardo said, reflecting the changing media consumption habits of the target audience.

Mr. Baiocco said, “We’re trying to be provocative, interesting, cool maybe, like the people we’re talking about” in the campaign. Grey New York is part of the Grey division of the Grey Group, which is owned by WPP.

Mars plans to run two commercials during the Grammys, for its Twix and Snickers cadies. They will follow the appearance during Super Bowl XLVII last Sunday of a new commercial for another Mars brand, M&M’s.

The commercial for Twix will be new, another in a humorous campaign, “Try both and pick a side,” that is centered on a fanciful history of the brand. The campaign describes how the left and right sides of each Twix bar are made in separate factories.

The commercial for Snickers was introduced recently, during the SAG Awards presentation on TBS and TNT. The spot, part of the humorous campaign “You’re not you when you’re hungry,” features Robin Williams and Bobcat Goldthwait.

The Snickers and Twix commercials, like the M&M’s Super Bowl spot, were created by BBDO, part of Omnicom.



Citing Potential Damages, Macmillan Settles With Justice Department on E-book Pricing

Macmillan said Friday it had agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by the Department of Justice over the pricing of e-books, asserting that the potential costs of continuing to fight the action were too high.

The agreement means that all five major publishing houses have settled the charges brought by the government last spring.

Apple Inc., which is also a defendant, will continue to trial in June, according to the Department of Justice. A spokesperson said Friday it was declining comment/

In a letter addressed to authors, illustrators and agents, Macmillan’s chief executive, John Sargent, said the risks were too great to go it alone.
“Our company is not large enough to risk a worst case judgment,” he said. “In this action the government accused five publishers and Apple of conspiring to raise prices. As each publisher settled, the remaining defendants became responsible not only for their own treble damages, but also possibly for the treble damages of the settling publishers minus what they settled for). A few weeks ago I got an estimate of the maximum possible damage figure. I cannot share the breathtaking amount with you, but it was much more than the entire equity of our company.”

In a suit filed last April, the Justice Department accused five major publishers and Apple of conspiring in e-mails and over lavish dinners to set the price of e-books at an artificially high level. The publishers had moved from a wholesale pricing model, which allowed retailers to charge what they wanted, to a system that allowed publishers to begin setting their own e-book prices, a model known as “agency pricing.”

The defendants said they were trying to protect themselves from Amazon, which was pricing e-books books below their actual cost, putting financial pressure on the publishers that they said would drive them out of business over time.

Nevertheless, three big publishing houses - HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Hachette - settled with the government immed! iately. Penguin, Macmillan and Apple decided to fight the charges. But in December, to clear the way for its merger with Random House, Penguin settled too.

The terms of the Macmillian settlement mirrors that agreed to by the other publishers. Macmillan will immediately lift restrictions it has imposed on discounting and other promotions by e-book retailers and will be prohibited until December 2014 from entering into new agreements with similar restrictions. The publisher must also provide the government advance notification to the of any e-book ventures it plans to undertake jointly with other publishers.



The Breakfast Meeting: Oscar Race Beyond the Grave, and Crowdsourcing Design

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has learned that selecting deceased movie figures for their Oscar night memorial reel can be as fraught as picking winners, Michael Cieply writes in The New York Times. Lobbying tends to be fierce, even though the committee that chooses whom to include is a closely guarded secret, and feelings tend to get hurt. This year’s awards will almost certainly include Ernest Borgnine, Charles Durning, Nora Ephron, Tony Scott, Richard Zanuck and Marvin Hamlisch, but since the Academy expanded the list to include notable film industry figures like makeup artists and publicists, there are often unpredictable honors and snubs. The commemoration of lesser-known figures has led to the exclusion of Corey Haim, Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur, a! mong others, omissions that can feel less like benign neglect than a slight. The Academy maintains a much longer obituary list on Oscars.com.

Alexander Wang, the popular fashion designer, is working with Samsung to create a print based on doodles, sketches and photographs submitted via Samsung Galaxy Note II smartphones. The result will be a unique design that will appear on a limited collection bag whose proceeds will be donated to charity, Elizabeth Olson writes. Samsung hopes that the collaboration will show how “technology empowers creativity,” Christine Cho, their director of global marketing, said. The campaign, which will mainly be spread via social media, should helpSamsung connect with a younger, cooler audience, much as their chief competitor in the device market, Apple, appealed to that constituency with independent bands.

No one dominates this year’s field of Grammy contenders like Adele did last year, and they are sure to lack the drama caused by her vocal surgery and Whitney Houston’s sudden death. That does not mean the awards lack for! interest! ing narratives, James C. McKinley Jr. reports. Here are some to watch this Sunday: Will Fun., the Brooklyn group whose “Some Nights” album, propelled by the single “We Are Young,” win record, album, song and best new artist of the year Will R&B singer Frank Ocean, whose solo debut album “Channel Orange” is on many critics’ top-10 lists, win best album, song or best new artist Will 39-year-old rapper Nas, who has never won a Grammy but has been nominated in all the rap categories, song, album, rap-sung collaboration (wit Amy Winehouse) and performance for his album “Life is Good,” walk away with an award this year



Signs of a Shift on Immigration Among G.O.P. Rank-and-File

With notable speed after the Nov. 6 presidential election, a number of Republican politicians and opinions makers â€" from House Speaker John A. Boehner to the talk show host Sean Hannity â€" altered their positions on immigration and expressed a new openness to comprehensive reform.

Since then, the push to overhaul the nation’s immigration system appears to have sustained momentum. A new ABC News/Washington Post poll found a jump in public approval of President Obama’s handling of immigration, and most recent polls have found a majority of Americans support providing immigrants who have come here illegally a pathway to United States citizenship.

So, has the shift on immigration among some â€" but not all â€" Republican legislators, strategists and media personalities filtered down to rank-and-file Republicans

The polling evidence â€" with a few significant caveats â€" says “possibly, yes.” There are signs of an uptick in Republican support for a pathway to citizenship, or at least a conditional pathway to citizenship.

First, the caveats. Tracking opinions on immigration policy over time is tricky because each pollster asks different questions with different options, making for apples-to-oranges comparisons. In addition, when narrowing the f! ocus to self-identified Republicans and Republican leaners, small sample sizes and large margin of sampling errors become a problem. A typical national survey includes about 1,000 respondents, making the subsample of Republicans pretty small, usually around 200 to 300.

But keeping those disclaimers in mind, the most recent polls on immigration suggest an increase in the percentage of Republicans who favor immigration reform that includes a route to United States citizenship.

On average, the share of Republicans who favor providing undocumented immigrants with a path to citizenship is 48 percent among the six national polls released so far in 2013 and included in the PollingReport.com database. (The release of a CNNpoll conducted Jan. 14-15 did not provide a breakdown by political party and is not included in the average).

Among the six previous polls that asked about a pathway to citizenship and released results by party identification, an average of only 38 percent of Republicans favored providing a path to citizenship.

Question wording has an effect here. Two of the polls that found the highest level of Republican support emphasized the requirements illegal immigrants might have to meet to become citizens. Conservative voters might be more likely to support a path to citizenship if it involves certain qualifications.

For instance, a Fox News poll conducted Jan. 15-17 among registered voters found that 56 percent of Republicans said the government should “allow illegal immigrants to remain in the ! country a! nd eventually qualify for U.S. citizenship, but only if they meet certain requirements like paying back taxes, learning English, and passing a background check.”

And a Gallup poll released this week found that 59 percent of Republicans would vote for “a law that would allow undocumented immigrants living in the United States the chance to become legal residents or citizens if they meet certain requirements.”

On the other hand, a CBS News poll of adults conducted Jan. 24-27 found that only 35 percent of Republicans said illegal immigrants currently working in the country “should be allowed to stay in their jobs and to eventually apply for U.S. citizenship.” (CBS found that 25 percent of Republicans said illegal immigrants should be able tostay as guest workers and 36 percent said they should be required to leave the United States).

The apples-to-apples comparisons we have are more mixed: Republican support in the mid-January AP/GfK poll jumped to 53 percent from 31 percent in 2010. The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll moved to 42 percent Republican support for a path to citizenship from 37 percent in November 2012 (that’s inside the margin of sampling error). The CBS News poll did not move at all, finding 35 percent Republican support in both its December 2012 and late January 2013 surveys. And Quinnipiac polls, released on Thursday and in early December 2012, both found roughly 40 percent of registered Republicans support a path to citizenship and just more than 10 percent support legal status without citizenship.

An uptick in Republican support for a pathway to citizenship could be statistical noise. And even if it is real, it could reverse itself. Some political science research suggests that anti-immigrant attitudes increase when immigration is in the news.

But there are reasons to think that immigration, over all, has become less of a hot-button issue. APew study found that the number of illegal immigrants living in the United States has dropped since the 2007 push for change. Another Pew survey found that only 44 percent of Republicans see dealing with immigration as a top priority. That’s down from previous peaks of 69 percent in 2007 and 61 percent in 2011.

Further polling is needed before a more concrete picture of Republican attitudes emerges. But if Republican voters have warmed to providing a conditional path to citizenship, it could increase the likelihood of an overhaul becoming law by freeing House Republicans, in particular, to back some kind of reform.