Total Pageviews

Hearst Executive Tied to Improper Texting Is Said to Resign

Executives who worked with Scott Sassa, the president of Hearst Entertainment, confirmed on Thursday that he had left the company.

Mr. Sassa, who was tied this week to a scandal involving improper text messages, informed executives at several of the entertainment divisions affiliated with Hearst that he had resigned. The New York Post reported on Thursday that Mr. Sassa had engaged in sending sexual text messages.

The executives who confirmed his departure spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did want to speak publicly about Mr. Sassa’s personal life.

Among the recent shows that were produced by Hearst Entertainment is the current hit on the History Channel, “The Bible.” Mr. Sassa was instrumental in securing a deal to buy half of the production company created by Mark Burnett, one of the most successful producers in television. Mr. Burnett is the producer of “The Bible.”

In a long career, Mr. Sassa has held top executive positions at companies including NBC, urner Broadcasting, Marvel Entertainment and Friendster.



Live Nation Names Gregory B. Maffei as Chairman

Live Nation Entertainment, the concert and ticketing giant, named Gregory B. Maffei as its new chairman on Thursday, the latest in a series of shifts in corporate allegiances for the company.

Mr. Maffei, 52, replaces Irving Azoff, the longtime music executive who had helped see Live Nation through its merger with Ticketmaster in 2010, and left at the end of last year. Unlike Mr. Azoff, Mr. Maffei, who had joined Live Nation’s board two years ago, will not hold an executive position.

Mr. Maffei’s arrival gives significant control of the company to Liberty Media, the conglomerate controlled by John C. Malone. Mr.
Maffei is the president and chief executive of Liberty Media, which is already Live Nation’s largest shareholder, with a 27 percent stake.

The move comes two days after the Madison Square Garden Company sold its $44 million stake in Live Nation; James Dolan, the chairman of MSG, stepped down from Live Nation’s board last month.

The announcement of Mr. Maffei’ appointment also came hours after another management change at the top of the live entertainment business.

As part of the Anschutz Company’s announcement that it was aborting the sale of the Anschutz Entertainment Group, or A.E.G., its sports and concerts division, the company also said that Timothy J. Leiweke, A.E.G.’s chief executive â€" and a longtime lieutenant to Philip F. Anschutz, the chairman â€" was leaving the company.



Live Nation Names Gregory B. Maffei as Chairman

Live Nation Entertainment, the concert and ticketing giant, named Gregory B. Maffei as its new chairman on Thursday, the latest in a series of shifts in corporate allegiances for the company.

Mr. Maffei, 52, replaces Irving Azoff, the longtime music executive who had helped see Live Nation through its merger with Ticketmaster in 2010, and left at the end of last year. Unlike Mr. Azoff, Mr. Maffei, who had joined Live Nation’s board two years ago, will not hold an executive position.

Mr. Maffei’s arrival gives significant control of the company to Liberty Media, the conglomerate controlled by John C. Malone. Mr.
Maffei is the president and chief executive of Liberty Media, which is already Live Nation’s largest shareholder, with a 27 percent stake.

The move comes two days after the Madison Square Garden Company sold its $44 million stake in Live Nation; James Dolan, the chairman of MSG, stepped down from Live Nation’s board last month.

The announcement of Mr. Maffei’ appointment also came hours after another management change at the top of the live entertainment business.

As part of the Anschutz Company’s announcement that it was aborting the sale of the Anschutz Entertainment Group, or A.E.G., its sports and concerts division, the company also said that Timothy J. Leiweke, A.E.G.’s chief executive â€" and a longtime lieutenant to Philip F. Anschutz, the chairman â€" was leaving the company.



Thomson Reuters Editor Indicted on Charges of Aiding Hackers Group

Matthew Keys, a 26-year-old deputy social media editor at Thomson Reuters, has been charged with assisting the hacking collective Anonymous in an attack on the Web site of The Los Angeles Times, the Justice Department said Thursday.

A federal indictment of Mr. Keys, formerly a Web producer at KTXL Fox 40, which, like The Los Angeles Times, is owned by the Tribune Co., alleges that he assisted Anonymous in a cyber attack on the newspaper’s Web site that allowed the group to gain access and alter a news feature.

The three-count indictment includes charges that in Dec. 2010 Mr. Keys provided Anonymous with log-in information for computers that belonged to the Tribune Company. The indictment also alleges that he encouraged the computer hackers to log onto the Tribune Company server and make changes to the news feature published on the paper’s Web site.

If convicted, Mr. Keys, who allegedly used the hacking code name AESCracked, could face up to 10 years in prison, plus three years of suprvised release and a fine of $250,000 for each count, the Justice Department said in a press release.

In an article on the indictment, Politico reported that in his current position at Reuters Mr. Keys had written about Anonymous . The charges on Thursday call into question Mr. Key’s reporting scoops at Reuters and whether those could have been the result of computer hacking.

Spokesmen for both Reuters and the Tribune Co. declined to comment.

Read the full indictment here.


Movie Aggregation Site to Close

LOS ANGELES â€" Movie critics are about to lose one of their more avid online fans.

MovieReviewIntelligence.com, an Internet site that aggregates reviews from dozens of newspapers, magazines and Web publications, will cease operating at the end of April, its editor and publisher, David A. Gross, said on Thursday.

“We just don’t have access to the big networks” of Web viewers needed to sustain the site, Mr. Gross said in a telephone interview. He referred, for instance, to movie-oriented sites like Rottentomatoes.com, a review-oriented service that was bought by Warner Brothers in 2011 and has a major presence on Apple’s iTunes.

Mr. Gross, a former marketing executive at 20th Century Fox, started Movie Review Intelligence in 2009, at a time whe professional film critics, threatened by layoffs and newspaper closings, were thought by some to be a vanishing breed. The site took a sophisticated approach to its data, looking at trends among national, alternative, and regional press, and using complex graphics to spot the strengths and weaknesses in films.

Through it all, Mr. Gross took a strong stance in behalf of critics, who, he maintained, have continued to affect the reception of movies, even as social media and mass marketing often seemed to override judgments about quality.

“Reviews are more influential now than ever before,” Mr. Gross said in a farewell statement he expected to post on his site.

He added: “As moviegoers see more reviews at the point of the movie transactionâ€"the mobile ticket purchase, the pay-TV download, the computer streamingâ€"we will continue to see better reviewed mov! ies over-perform at the box-office, and poorly reviewed movies under-perform.”

After founding the site as an independent venture, Mr. Gross searched in vain for a business ally that might give it the reach of a powerhouse like Amazon’s film data service, IMDb.com. (Another competitor, Metacritic.com, also produces scores based on reviews of games, television shows, and music.)

Since initiating coverage in June of 2009, Movie Review Intelligence analyzed the reviews of about 3,125 movies, Mr. Gross said. It has been attracting about 400,000 hits, and 85,000 visitors, each month.

Asked about his plans, Mr. Gross said he expected to become a consultant â€" and perhaps to sleep in occasionally, instead of waking up to collect overnight reviews.

“I get up at 4 a.m. to make sure we’re current,” he said.



Boston Phoenix to Cease Publication

The Boston Phoenix, an alternative weekly newspaper that attracted a following with its sharp political coverage and smart insight into the cultural and music scene, announced Thursday that it would be folding after failing to attract sufficient advertising revenue.

The print publication will cease immediately. The online issue for the week of March 22 will be the publication’s last. Sister papers in Maine and Rhode Island will remain open, the company said.

The Phoenix has struggled with the loss of advertising that has affected the rest of the newspaper business, yet only six months ago the owners announced a transition to a glossy magazine format that seemed to signal a commitment to continue publishing. However, on Thursday it was clear that the advertising they had hoped would materialize did not.

“We are a textbook example of sweeping marketplace change,” the executive editor, Peter Kadzis, said in a statement. “Our recent switch to a magazine format met with applause from eaders and local advertisers. Not so â€" with a few exceptions â€" national advertisers. It was the long-term decline of national advertising dollars that made the Boston Phoenix economically unviable.”



Geithner to Write Book on Financial Crisis

Timothy F. Geithner, the former Treasury secretary who managed the Obama administration’s response to the global financial crisis of 2008 and the recession that followed, will publish a book recounting that harrowing time, his publisher said Thursday.

Crown Books, an imprint of Random House, said the as yet-untitled book would have behind-the-scenes details about the strategy that policymakers devised, and how decisions were made. The books is scheduled for publication in 2014.

In a press release, Crown promised that “Secretary Geithner will aim to answer the most important - and to many the most troubling - questions about the choices he and his colleagues made.”

There have already been numerous books on the financial crisis, including bestsellers like “Too Big to Fail,” (2009) by Andrew Ross Sorkin, a columnist for The New York Times, and “The Big Short” (2010) by Michael Lewis.

Still, there is little doubt that Mr. Geithner, who ran Treasury from 2009 until earlierthis year and was president and chief executive of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York before that, is uniquely situated to provide inside information on decision making.

Mr. Geithner has received intense ongoing criticism from Republicans who have called the bailout he engineered a waste of government funds. The press release hinted that Mr. Geithner will both answer his many critics as well as admit to mistakes that will be a guidepost for future leaders.



Is It Too Early for 2016 Polls

There are more than 1,000 days before the 2016 Iowa caucuses, but several polls have already been released testing national support for prospective candidates for the Republican and Democratic nominations for president.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has a huge lead on the Democratic side. Surveys show the possible Republican field as more competitive, with Senator Marco Rubio of Florida out front and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey clustered with several other candidates in the top tier.

But isn’t it too early to even look at such polls Aren’t they more valuable as entertainment than information

Not necessarily.

An examination of pre-midterm presidential polling since 1984 â€" surveys conducted from the day after the preceding presidential vote to the day before the midterm elections â€" shows that while early primary polls are not determinative, they are not meaningless, either.

Presidential polls generally become more umerous after midterm elections, and our polling database is too spotty in the pre-midterm period to draw a solid picture before 1984. Since 1984, however, we have at least two pre-midterm polls for each party for each election, and those surveys have followed a consistent pattern: the early leader on the Republican side is very likely to become the nominee, while the early leader on the Democratic side is not.

(A few quick notes about the chart that follows: It shows polling for the past five primary contests for each party in which the party was not running an incumbent president. The eventual nominee is highlighted in yellow, candidates who never formally entered the campaign are in blue, and the right-most column of each chart shows the number of polls each candidate was included in as a fraction of the total number of polls in our database for that primary cycle.)

For both the Republican and Democratic parties, pre-midterm polls have generally guessed only about 50 percent of the field of candidates correctly â€" about half of the candidates included in early polling decided not to run, and roughly just as many candidates not included in any early polls entered the race.

Significantly, however, the eventual nominee for each party has been included in at least one pre-midterm poll in every cycle since 1984. With half of the actual candidates missing from early polling, the surveys’ perfect record in including the nominee might seem surprising.

But in addition to including the eventual nominee, early polls also correctly identified the top tier contenders, especially since 2004 when pre-midterm polling become more robust. The last miss of a major candidate was in 2000: Senator Jon McCain of Arizona was not included in any of the six polls conducted before the 1998 midterms, yet he proved to be the main challenger to the ultimate nominee, Gov. George W. Bush of Texas.

In fact, most of those not included in the early polls who did later get into the race fizzled once voting began (for 2012 that list includes Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann and Buddy Roemer). This, perhaps, speaks to the need for successful candidates to begin laying the groundwork for a campaign early, gathering money, party support and campaign infrastructure in the “invisible primary” and thus tipping off pollsters of their potential interest in running for president.

Identifying the field is one thing, but how have pre-midterm polls done in identifying the eventual nominee Polls of the Republican contests have been prescient. Since 1988, the early Republican front-runner went on ! to win th! e nomination in three of the five open primary campaigns.

In the other two election cycles, 2008 and 2000, the second-place candidate went on to win. In early polls for 2008, Mr. McCain was just two percentage points behind Rudy Giuliani, the former New York mayor whose campaign fizzled once voting began. And in pre-midterm surveys of the 2000 Republican primary, Mr. Bush was five percentage points behind the former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who did not run.

On the Democratic side, however, the early Democratic front-runner failed to win the nomination in all five years in our sample, 1984, 1988, 1992, 2004 and 2008. (The 2000 cycle is not included because there were no Democratic primary polls available in the pre-midterm period, from the day after the 1996 presidential election to the day before the 1998 midterms).

Early Democratic polls came closest to calling the winner in 1984, when former Vice President Walter Mondale of Minnesota â€" the eventual nominee â€" ran a strong secod behind Senator.Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, who never entered the race. Besides 1984, the only other year in our sample in which the eventual Democratic nominee polled in double digits before the midterms was in 2008, an anomalous case.

President Obama, with 17 percent, was second to Senator Clinton. But while our database has 26 Democratic primary polls between the 2004 re-election of President Bush and the 2006 midterms, Mr. Obama was included in just one. It was not until after the midterms that Mr. Obama, the Illinois senator, began to appear in most surveys.

In 1988, 1992 and 2004 â€" all years with a Republican in the White House running for re-election â€" most of the Democratic front-runners in early polls never entered the race, and candidates in the single digits went on to win the nomination. In 1992, for instance, Gov. Bill Clinton of Arkansas won just 3 percent support in the one pre-midterm poll that included him. He was! stuck be! hind eight other Democrats. But, perhaps scared off by President George Bush’s strong approval ratings in 1989 and most of 1990, all eight of the Democrats polling ahead of Mr. Clinton declined to run.

What does all this say about the early 2016 surveys (almost of them from the Democratic-leaning pollster Public Policy Polling)

If Mr. Rubio can maintain the polling lead until the 2014 midterms, history would suggest that he will very likely run in 2016. In our sample, just one erly front-runner on the Republican side, Mr. Powell, decided not to seek the nomination.

Recent history might also suggest that Mrs. Clinton’s current lead cannot hold. Imbalances in name recognition among the candidates can have a substantial effect on early primary polling, and Mrs. Clinton and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the onetime Delaware senator, are much more well-known than other possible contenders like Gov. Martin O’Malley of Maryland.

But Mrs. Clinton may be able to break the Democrats’ early front-runners’ losing streak. Her lead in the polls we have so far exceeds that of any other candidate â€" of either party â€" in any election cycle in our sample. Many observers have pointed out that Mrs. Clinton also had a large lead in early polls of 2008 and yet lost that race. But her 2016 lead over Mr. Biden (33 percentage points) exceeds even her 2008 lead ov! er Mr. Ob! ama (22 percentage points). And she may benefit from the sense of being “the next in line,” having been the runner-up in her party’s last open contest â€" a dynamic seen in several recent Republican primaries.

With such a small sample â€" only five election cycles for each party â€" and just a few pre-midterm polls available in each cycle before 2000, it could be risky to read too much into the pattern of Republican accuracy and Democratic inaccuracy in pre-midterm primary polls. There will be many more polls before the 2014 midterms, the Republican and Democratic front-runners may change, and recent history suggests the eventual field for each party is quite likely to look very different than the one shown above. But that doesn’t mean that the polls we see over the next 18 months aren’t worth noting.



House of Nerds: What If You Crossed a Political Convention and SxSW

If someone melts down on CNN, is that just one small gaffe or the natural order of things Ashley Parker and David Carr recap episode six of “House of Cards” through the prism of politics and media. In this step-back, we end up detouring through the South-by-Southwest festival, where yes, people were talking about Frank Underwood and Zoe Barnes in addition to Dennis Crowley and Elon Musk.

Version 6.0 of this series has spoilers baked into the code, so avoid if you have not seen. And if you want to catch up with past chats, you can find episode one, two,three, four or five for the clicking.

Episode 6.

Synopsis: Congressman Frank Underwood’s battle with the teachers union over his education bill finally comes to a close, but only after a major public embarrassment for him, when a CNN interview goes awry. Congressman Peter Russo, recently sober, asks Frank for his help in becoming governor of Pennsylvania.

Parker: In this episode, I was reminded of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s real-world admonishment when he was serving as chief of staff in the Obama White House: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”

Every crisis is a potential opportunity, Mr. Emanuel understood â€" an adage the fictional Frank Underwood intuits after a brick goes flying through his townhouse! window one evening. Though he can’t officially pin the vandalism on the labor unions and its leader, Marty Spinella, who’s leading the teachers’ strike against Frank’s education bill, he certainly seizes the moment to make a compelling hearsay case.

“Disorganized labor” becomes Frank’s rallying cry, as he spins the brick-throwing incident as an indictment of Mr. Spinella’s failure to control his troops. Pretty soon, the phrase has gone viral, popping up as a talking point in the corridors of Congress and on cable news. (The labor unions, warns one talking head, “might want to tone down the rhetoric before disorganized labor turns into organized crime.”)

In a way, this pure political calculation reminds me of what we’ve seen recently in Congress, with sequestration. Each side has tried to use the crisis of automatic and arbitrary across-the-board spending cuts to blame their opponents. The Obama administration, for instance, canceled all WhiteHouse tours (Message: Blame the Republicans that your 12-year-old child can no longer visit 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue on your long-planned trip to D.C.), while the Republicans held media events at military facilities in their district (Message: Blame the Democrats for our soon-to-be weakened national defense).

By the end of the episode, Frank has seen his fortunes turn twice â€"first for the worst, when his embarrassing CNN interview goes viral, and then for the “better,” in a perverse sense, when a inner-city elementary school boy who should have been in school is killed in a gang drive-by.

“I’ve got a dead, underprivileged kid in my pocket,” Frank tells Marty Spinella. “What do you have”

So, David, I’m curious: In both “House of Cards” and in our actual Congress, is this savvy politics, or politics at its most base

Carr: I loved watching Frank melt down under the hot lights of cable news when his moment came. He takes such delight in watch! ing other! s stumble that seeing him in the same crucible and watching as the marble slowly rolled off the table seemed like a fair comeuppance.

Anybody who has ever been on television can identify with that moment. I was on “Real Time” with Bill Maher one time and I stupidly tried to be funny on a comedian’s show. I was trying to make a joke about how he and other people see people from middle America. But then the room bounced at the wrong time, he brought me up short and it sounded like I was the effete jerk making fun of average Americans.

I spent three days on the Internet as the worst person on the planet and there were calls for me to be flogged or fired from government officials, radio talk show hosts and many others. My brother even called to chew me out. You can try to explain yourself, to fill them in on the subtext and what really happened, but then, the camera doesn’t lie. Or does it

The power of that cable-powered echo chamber is so well-rendered on this episode, I felt a littleuncomfortable watching it. By now, we know the drill: The soundbite comes un-moored from its context, and suddenly it is a meme that catches fire. Before you know it, it is auto-tuned to its most damaging perfection.

(There was one thing that I have to whinge about in this episode and it has nothing to do with politics or media. Mr. Russo’s sponsor in a program of recovery is chosen for him by Frank. Without getting into the particulars, even in the District and om Hollywood, where recovery programs and professional life crash in unseemly ways, I think this is too far-fetched. With that out of the way, I do think that they get most of the alcoholic stuff â€" both drunk and sober â€" right on the money.)

As usual, Frank gets what he needs in this episode, even when he doesn’t get exactly what he wants, which is a strong, running theme of the show. But it makes you wonder when the music stops, if Frank will be right over the chair he wants or just one step to the left or right. You have! to know ! that he will crush whoever is sitting there.

Weird question if you want, Ashley. We bumped into each other at the South-by-Southwest conference, an event where people wear badges, important men make speeches and the hierarchy is vigorously enforced in both business and social settings. If you get my drift, did you find your time in Austin refreshing or annoyingly familiar

Parker: In a weird way, SXSW reminded me of a political convention â€" the good and the bad. You had the legitimately interesting people keynoting the conference (the equivalent of the Bill Clintons and Chris Christies, if you will); you had the hangers-on and scenesters who were there just to be there and “take meetings” (the lobbyists, perhaps); and then there was everyone in between (the journalists, the aides and staffers, the PR swarms). You even had actual politicians, with everyone from Al Gore to the twitter-savvy Newark Mayor Cory Booker popping up to speechify.

You had hotels that were too epensive and too far from the downtown, you had free food and free alcohol, you had long days and even longer nights, you had parties you were invited to and parties you crashed, you had fortuitous run-ins with people you knew from back home and people you only knew from Twitter, and you had a definite scarcity of cabs. (A fitting parallel: at the 2008 Democratic convention in Denver, I somehow found myself at 3 a.m. stranded in the freezing rain in the warehouse district after a party, and had to take pedi-cab 60 blocks back to my hotel . This past week, I found myself a bit earlier in the eveningâ€" I am now four years older, alas â€" stranded in the pouring rain in the warehouse district after a party, and had to take a pedi-cab a mile back to my hotel).

Of course, we were both there for the interactive part of the week, which maybe was more wonky and dorky â€" and more like a political convention â€" than the rest of the week, which is basically just one giant film festival and concert featu! ring set ! after set of great shows.

One funny thing, though, was that as soon as anyone learned I was from D.C., the first question they invariably asked was, “Do you watch ‘House of Cards’”

Carr: True that, but then the question quickly pivoted to the implications of the Netflix delivery model, the threat to cable bundles, and a future of consumers calling the shots and ala carte programming. That and whether Slugline was going to IPO any time soon.



Chris Hayes to Take Over 8 P.M. Show on MSNBC

Chris Hayes will take over the 8 p.m. time slot on MSNBC in the next month, the channel is planning to announce on Thursday morning, the day after the current host of that hour, Ed Schultz, said he was moving from the weekdays to the weekends.

Mr. Hayes, a liberal intellectual who has hosted a well-regarded weekend morning program on MSNBC for the past 18 months, is a protege of Rachel Maddow, the highest-rated host on the channel. He will become the lead-in for her 9 p.m. program, “The Rachel Maddow Show.”

The change is predicated on the belief that MSNBC can win a wider audience with Mr. Hayes than it did with Mr. Schultz, a champion of the working class whose bluster didn’t always pair well with Ms. Maddow and the channel’s other prime time program, “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell.” Mr. Hayes, on the other hand, is just as wonky as Ms. Maddow and Mr. O’Donnell, andis a regular contributor to both of their programs.

Mr. Hayes’s promotion was described by people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because it had not been officially announced by the channel yet. Once it takes effect, Mr. Hayes, 34, will be the youngest host of a prime-time show on any of the country’s major cable news channels, all of which seek out youthful viewers but tend to have middle-aged hosts and a core audience made up of senior citizens. Of Mr. Schultz’s one million viewers last year, for example, only 249,000 were between the ages of 25 and 54.

Ms. Maddow had an average of 339,000 viewers in that key demographic. Usually cable news ratings work the other way â€" the programs earlier in the evening outperform the programs later in the evening. That’s partly why MSNBC sees an opportunity to grow at 8 p.m.

But taking over that hour is a difficult assignment for Mr. Hayes, given Bill O’Reilly’s commanding grip on the time slot! . Mr. O’Reilly, the biggest star on the Fox News Channel, routinely doubled Mr. Schultz’s delivery of 25- to 54-year-old viewers last year, much to the chagrin of Mr. Schultz, who parodied his rival on a regular basis. The ratings imbalance at 8 p.m. helped to obscure the fact that MSNBC has, in prime time overall, crept closer to Fox in that age group.

Mr. Hayes is as eager as anyone at MSNBC to beat Fox, even if the two channels don’t actually fight for the same viewers. His metamorphosis from a writer at The Nation magazine to a broadcaster began several years ago when he was signed up to be a part-time paid contributor to MSNBC. He impressed executives at the channel when he filled in for Ms. Maddow in 2011, and in September of that year he was given his weekend morning show, called “Up with Chris Hayes”

“Up” doesn’t have a huge audience â€" it had about 139,000 viewers ages 25 to 54 last month â€" but it consistently beats CNN on Saturday and Sunday mornings, and it has been praised by media critics for allowing long, thoughtful conversations about politics and public policy, the kind rarely seen elsewhere on television.

These conversations usually project a liberal worldview, in line with MSNBC as a whole. But Mr. Hayes and his producers also try to book expert guests who don’t often get on television, including conservatives; a recent discussion with Mr. Hayes and four conservatives lit up the blogosphere. “Add this segment to the list of reasons Chris Hayes’ Up has become the most interesting weekend political show in America,” wrote BuzzFeed at the time.

An MSNBC spokeswoman declined to comment on the impending change. The people who described it on co! ndition o! f anonymity did not say what would replace “Up” on weekend mornings. Nor did they say when exactly Mr. Hayes would move to prime time.

Mr. Schultz said on Wednesday night that he’d sign off on Thursday, then start his new weekend program in April. It will be shown from 5 to 7 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays.



The Breakfast Meeting: The ‘Today’ Show’s Popularity Woes, and Anxiety at Time Inc.

NBC’s “Today” has continued to lag behind ABC’s “Good Morning America” for 10 months now, a ratings slump that started just one week after its co-host, Matt Lauer, signed a contract with NBC said to be worth $25 million a year, the highest compensation ever on a morning show, Brian Stelter reports. Some “Today” staffers cite a lack of audience connection to Mr. Lauer as the root of the problem. Mr. Lauer’s popularity plummeted when his co-host, Ann Curry, was forced out last summer. Mr. Lauer, 55, started a belated image campaign this week, publicly stating that he thought his bosses had botched Ms. Curry’s departure, but it may be too late.  Alex Wallace, the NBC News executive in charge of “Today,” said NBC wants Mr. Lauer to be host for “years to come.”  The network has denied suggestions that it may replace him with a younger host like Willie Geit, 37, or David Gregory, 42.

At a lavish party for Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg last week, some Time Inc. employees seemed rattled about the publishing company’s coming separation from Time Warner, Christine Haughney writes. Parties like this one, held at Time Warner’s headquarters, may become a thing of the past for Time Inc. as it confronts its steep financial challenges. As a stand-alone entity, the magazine publisher will face $500 million to $1 billion in debt â€" unlike News Corporation’s publishing arm, which will be debt-free when it separates from its parent company this year â€" and Time Inc.’s circulation and advertising revenue have suffered sharp declines in recent years. The company’s executives hope their newfound freedom lets them use profits to transition to a digital age rather than paying them back to a parent company.

Some good news for Spain is ! finally enjoying media attention, Raphael Minder reports. Blogs like Bright Spain and newspapers like Buenas Noticias (Good News) offer an alternative to the relentless pessimism about the country’s economic prospects. Buenas Noticias, which is backed by Coca-Cola and Pepsico, ignored Spain’s 26 percent unemployment rate to publish articles about companies that are recruiting workers in Spain, including Renault, McDonald’s and Telefónica, which is offering 200 internships (Telefónica also plans to lay off 5,600 workers, which the article did not mention).

The approaching end of the television season means it’s time for shows to be renewed or canceled, and leads Mike Hale to wonder: what will become of the ABC Family comedy “Bunheads” ABC has not yet announced if it will be canceled, and the show, about life and dance in the California hills, has lost about 40 percent of its audience over the course of its season. It would be a shame to give up on a show that, beyond being charming and funny, is unlike anything else on television at the moment, Mr. Hale writes.

Joe Chetrit, a secretive property mogul in New York, could come into the spotlight on Friday with the closing of his biggest deal: the $1.1. billion purchase of the Sony Building on Madison Avenue, Charles V. Bagli writes. Mr. Chetrit outmaneuvered about 20 other bidders to secure the deal and plans to convert the building, which has served as the headquarters for AT&T and Sony, into a mix of luxury condominiums, a hotel and high-end retai! l shops. ! Many experts say the deal is very risky because Sony plans to remain in the building for three years, after which it will take two years and $500 million to renovate the building.  Interest rates could soar and the condo market could dry up before the building is ready in 2019.

NBC’s “Smash,” an ambitious drama about creating a Broadway production, essentially ended on Wednesday when the network announced that the show would be moved to Saturday for the remainder of its second season, Bill Carter reports. The show’s ratings have been abysmal, and the move, set to take place on April 6, basically means the show will die in obscurity. NBC said that the Tuesday slot previously held by “Smash” would be filled by the new reality dating show, “Ready for Love.”



Fandango Creates a Movie Buzz Index

LOS ANGELES - Movie buzz is a heavily tilled field. Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes track film reviews. The Internet Movie Database operates a heat index. Boxoffice.com offers charts based on Twitter and Facebook chatter.

Add to that fray Fanticipation, a new movie buzz indicator from Fandango, the online ticket seller. This ranking of upcoming releases - based on a formula that includes social media data and advance ticket sales â€" will be part of a new weekly video series called “Weekend Ticket,” which arrives on Fandango.com on Thursday.

Fandango, owned by Comcast, already processes the bulk of online movie ticket sales in the United States, but people tend to leave Fandango.com soon after making their purchase. Fanticipation represents an attempt to make the site (and its related mobile platforms) more of a hub for movie fans, increasing ticket sales and selling more online ads in the process.