The Internet's Verbal Contrarian

Bryce Vickmark for The New York Times

Evgeny Morozov, author of the new “To Save Everything, Click Here,” in Harvard Yard in Cambridge, Mass., where he is working on a doctorate.

For every revolution, there is a counterrevolutionary. And so the digital one has brought us Evgeny Morozov.

A 29-year-old émigré from Belarus, Mr. Morozov has quickly become the most prominent, most multiplatformed critic of the utopian promises coming from Silicon Valley. His first book, “The Net Delusion,” looked skeptically at the belief that social networks were responsible for fomenting political change across the globe, and in the new “To Save Everything, Click Here” he has expanded that critique to question whether the Internet has improved anything.

With the recent revelations about National Security Agency surveillance, Mr. Morozov is taking a victory lap of sorts. In an essay last month, he finds vindication for his pessimistic views about the Internet, as the world turns on the United States over its spying on overseas digital communications and as oppressive governments are emboldened to crack down: “This is the real tragedy of America's ‘Internet freedom agenda': It's going to be the dissidents in China and Iran who will pay for the hypocrisy that drove it from the very beginning.”

Mr. Morozov has written for a long list of publications, including London Review of Books, The New York Times and The New Republic. In addition to the sheer volume of Mr. Morozov's writings, there is his sheer volume. His style is aggressive and frequently accusatory, with a litany of digital idealists and organizations that he uses as punching bags. These include Facebook, Google, the publisher and writer Tim O'Reilly and the City University of New York professor and new-media guru Jeff Jarvis, whose book “Public Parts” Mr. Morozov savaged in a 6,000-word review in The New Republic, which included the memorable line, “This is a book that should've stayed a tweet.”

The aggressive, barroom quality of his writing has earned him plenty of admirers, as well as detractors who consider him a childish contrarian. But after becoming such a public, public intellectual by his mid-20s, Mr. Morozov has made a curious decision: to further his education. During the semester you could find him finishing his coffee upstairs at a Starbucks before making the walk across Harvard Yard for his seat at a seminar on the history of psychoanalysis as a first-year Harvard doctoral candidate in the history of science.

“I have more influence than I ought to have,” he said in the train to New York City from Boston, adding that he had a nagging feeling that his criticisms were too shallow. “The idea of the Internet allowed me to cut too many corners, intellectually.”

His new thinking is evident in “To Save Everything,” released in March. In the book Mr. Morozov puts quotation marks around every reference to “the Internet,” and with that tic he makes a larger point: readers should stop and question everything they have been taught about technology, including that the Internet exists.

Without such skepticism, Mr. Morozov and his supporters say, the public easily succumbs to the slick promises and catchwords of online entrepreneurs or TED talks - “open” or “generative” or “transparent” or “participatory.” And those words lead to real beliefs, with real consequences, he argues - for example, that privacy is just an archaic notion, or that information “wants to be free.”

Critics have generally welcomed “To Save Everything” for its contrary take, if not always how that take is expressed. Writing in The Times's Book Review, Ellen Ullman, a novelist and former computer programmer, says Mr. Morozov “is taking up the cause of human values against those of the machine,” though she adds that his “polemical tone is wearying.”

Tim Wu, the Columbia Law School professor and frequent Morozov target, writes that the book was more of the same and that his attacks appear to be “mainly designed to build Morozov's particular brand of trollism; one suspects he aspires to be a Bill O'Reilly for intellectuals.”

In person, too, Mr. Morozov can quickly turn adversarial, and not only when he threatens to stop talking because his interlocutor's knowledge “is too limited.” He is as likely to spot a contradiction in his own thinking, saying something like, “You are going to catch me here, but who cares?”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: August 14, 2013

An earlier version of this article misspelled an example of an Internet intellectual movement. It is cybernetics, not cyberkinetics.

A version of this article appeared in print on August 15, 2013, on page C1 of the New York edition with the headline: The Internet's Verbal Contrarian.